| "Physics Education and Student Cognition" |
|
Spring
Meeting of the Illinois Section of the AAPT April 4-5, 2008 University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois |
|
Friday, April 4, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9:30 - 5:30 |
Registration.
Loomis Lab foyer (outside of rooms 141 & 151), 1110 W. Green St.
Urbana. Please make out checks to "ISAAPT".
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10:00 - 12:00 |
Workshop W1. "Increasing Student Engagement Using Personal Response Systems (Clickers) in Lecture", Mats Selen, Department of Physics, University of Illinois. Loomis 151. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10:00 - 12:00 | Workshop W2. "Inquiry-Based Teaching in High School Physics", Members of the 2008 graduating class of PTE majors at Illinois State University including Erik Brieger, Christopher Bush, Drew Sulski, Shane Hanson, Scott Kupiec, Mathew Herzau, John Metzler, Michael Turner and Ted Heyduck. Loomis 234. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11:00 - 12:00 | Workshop W3. Cracker Barrel: "Physics Teacher Candidate Preparation", Ad Hoc Committee for the Recruitment, Preparation, and Retention of High School Physics Teachers. Led by Carl Wenning, David Sykes, and Tom Foster. Loomis 158. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
12:00 - 1:15 |
Lunch - on your own. See the list of restaurants on the Web site. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3:00 - 3:05 | Welcome - Loomis 151 - Prof. Dale Van Harlingen, Head, Department of Physics, UIUC |
|
3:05 - 3:30 |
"Cognitive Science: Problem Solving and Learning for Physics Education" Professor Brian Ross Much research has been conducted in cognitive science that might be applicable to physics education. I will focus on some general principles of problem solving and learning, as well as a number of basic findings and their implications, including the improvement of problem solving. The areas of research to be discussed include specialized cognitive systems, the importance of content in thinking, and the use of categories and analogies. |
| 3:30 - 4:00 |
"Mental Models in Understanding Physics: Misconceptions and Learning" Dr. David Brookes I will present results of a reading study that shows the usefulness of probing physics students' cognitive processing by measuring reading time. According to contemporary discourse theory, people create a mental model while reading a text. If the reader encounters conflicting information, their construction of a coherent mental model is disrupted and reading times are prolonged. We used this effect to study how "non-Newtonian" and "Newtonian" students create mental models of conceptual systems in physics as they read texts related to the idea of Newton's third law. We found significant effects of prior knowledge state on patterns of reading time, suggesting that students attempt to actively integrate physics texts with their existing knowledge. Despite non-Newtonian students' attempts to integrate the new information, there is little evidence of a shift in their ideas after reading the text. I will discuss the implications of this result for what we want students to learn and how we want them to learn it. |
| 8:15 - 9:15 |
"The Ultra-Cold Frontier"
Dr. Brian
DeMarco Physicists around the world routinely cool atom gases to temperatures colder than the farthest regions of inter-stellar space. Atomic motion cannot escape its quantum mechanical nature at these ultra-cold temperatures, where thermal deBrogile wavelengths can approach a tenth of the diameter of a human hair. I'll explain how atom gases can be cooled to nano-Kelvin temperatures on a tabletop without using equipment colder than room temperature. I'll also show how atom gases, when trapped in a crystal formed from light, are now being used to resolve decade old questions about models of solid materials. |
|
9:30 - 10:00 |
"What Instructors Should Know About How Students Interpret Symbols in Physics" Eugene Torigoe In studies involving nearly 1000 students we have found that numeric versions of certain questions have averages that are almost 50% higher than equivalent symbolic versions. Analysis of students' written work as well as student interviews suggests that this effect is related to confusion about the meaning of symbols. I will begin by describing how the structure of numeric solutions aids students in correctly answering physics questions and then discuss the ways in which symbolic questions impose greater cognitive demands on students than do numeric questions. I will conclude by discussing connections between student performance on numeric and symbolic questions, and overall success in physics. |
| 10:00 - 10:30 |
"Do Problem-Solvers Notice Changes Made to a Physics Problem while They are Reading and Explaining It?" Adam Feil Human attention is quite limited, and even in situations where students are "paying attention", they may not be attending to relevant aspects of the problem or example in front of them. Using methods from visual cognition, we set up an experiment where features of physics problems were changed while students were reasoning about and explaining the problems. We found that a student's initial understanding of a problem has a significant effect on whether or not a given change will be noticed. Examples will be shown and discussed, and implications for physics teaching will be explored. |
| Last update: April 1, 2008 |